On 15 Apr 2008, at 18:07, Sandro Hawke wrote: > > > We have some new drafts from the Rule Interchange Format (RIF) Working > Group. While the group is not targeted at producing a "Semantic Web > Rule Language", its output will cover much of the same space. I > suggest > anyone interested in rule languages (especially from a web > perspective) > take a look at what RIF is doing and send comments: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-bld/ (our first RIF dialect, Horn with > Equality) > http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-fld/ (framework for more logic dialects) > http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-rdf-owl/ (how to use BLD with RDF, OWL-DL, > OWL-Full) I'm more-or-less ignorant of the technical issues here, but at a surface level the presentation syntax given in example 2 of the FLD appears to have some arbitrary differences from SPARQL, eg the use of abbr expands into uri instead of PREFIX abbr: <uri> and the use of ()s for grouping, as opposed to {}s, and some of the operators being prefix and some being infix. There may well be cultural reasons for this syntax, but I expect many people to want to work with both syntaxes, and some commonality might be helpful in reducing the learning curve. - SteveReceived on Wednesday, 16 April 2008 10:36:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 16 April 2008 10:36:52 GMT