W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-rules@w3.org > June 2005

Re: Web Rule Language - WRL vs SWRL

From: Adrian Walker <adrianw@snet.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:32:47 -0400
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20050623122413.02d00280@pop.snet.net>
To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Cc: www-rdf-rules@w3.org, Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>, dreer@fh-furtwangen.de

Hi Jim --

At 11:07 PM 6/22/2005 -0400, you wrote:
>I spent many years of my career arguing against DL and doing scruffy AI - 
>yet here I am defending OWL - why?  because the design time and fights 
>over the details of a number of use cases ended up creating something 
>pretty damn useful -- both in the OWL DL space and in the OWL Full space 
>-- so somehow the process worked...

You make a good point.  A lot of the practical work on SW rules (e.g. 
jena), and on related SQL-flavored langages, is still more scruffy than 
neat.  A recent attempt to neatify some of it is at

      http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rule-workshop-discuss/2005Jun/att-0006/00-part

Cheers,   -- Adrian



INTERNET BUSINESS LOGIC (R)
www.reengineeringllc.com

Adrian Walker
Reengineering LLC
PO Box 1412
Bristol
CT 06011-1412 USA

Phone: USA 860 583 9677
Cell:    USA  860 830 2085
Fax:    USA  860 314 1029
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2005 16:33:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:53:12 GMT