- From: Jos de Bruijn <jos.debruijn@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:01:29 +0100
- To: www-rdf-rules@w3.org
Hi all,
I have a question regarding SWRL FOL [1] to which someone here might
know the answer:
SWRL FOL is an extension of SWRL to first-order logic. However, there do
not appear to be any function symbols in the language. Did I overlook
something in the document?
Could someone tell me why we would want to restrict the expressiveness
of the language? Why not define a full first-order logic and define
subsets with some specific desirable properties?
Thanks for the clarification!
Best, Jos
[1] http://www.daml.org/2004/11/fol/proposal
--
Please take notice of my new email address:
jos.debruijn@deri.org
Jos de Bruijn, http://homepage.uibk.ac.at/~c703239/
+43 512 507 6475
jos.debruijn@deri.org
Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI)
http://www.deri.org/
Received on Monday, 22 November 2004 12:01:36 UTC