At 01:02 PM 11/18/2003, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >From: Stefan Decker <stefan@ISI.EDU> >Subject: Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF >Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:15:47 +0000 > > > > > Hi, > > > > as far as I understand the discussion there are different issues: > > > > 1) Reasoning with the Closed World Assumption on a given graph > > 2) Naming a given graph. > > 3) Collecting (or completing) a graph (data transclusion) > > > > I think we all agree that doing 1) is easy. > >[...] > >Not so fast. What if it is difficult to determine just what objects >(belonging to a particular class) exist? Then what does closing (a class) >mean? Free your mind! (from semantics ;-). I was talking about the graph - not the semantics. Closed World applied to Description Logic is a different story. Best, Stefan >peter -- http://www.isi.edu/~stefanReceived on Tuesday, 18 November 2003 08:44:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:53:10 GMT