W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-rules@w3.org > November 2003

Re: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C work

From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 18:12:18 +0000
Message-ID: <3FA93D82.4070501@eircom.net>
Cc: www-rdf-rules@w3.org

Patrick Stickler wrote:
> 
> I agree with Jeen's points below.
> 
> To add my own 2 cents, I'd also like to see query and rules solutions
> for RDF expressed *in* RDF. 

I'm not sure how that would be done in RDF as it stands, given its
expressive power, but it seems like a nice thing to have.


> [...]
> 
> It also alleviates the need to learn/parse/support yet another syntax,
> and allows one to reason about queries and rules just like any other
> knowledge expressed in RDF.

Not neccessarily. You could imagine a concrete query syntax for RDF 
  that was different to current formats. In fact I'd want syntax 
that made queries and rules fun to write - the bar should be set 
very high for usable syntax, especially for query. There's a  lot to 
be learned from efforts like the RNG compact syntax, or XPath.

If these efforts are conjoined I would still like to have specs that 
allow me to write a conformant rules engine if all I need is a rules 
engine, without having to implement  a query engine, or vice versa. 
If they're not kept apart for implementation, they become mutual 
barriers to entry.

Bill de hÓra
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:12:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 11:10:14 UTC