W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-rules@w3.org > January 2003

RE: R:RDF query testcases?

From: Seaborne, Andy <Andy_Seaborne@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:36:40 -0000
Message-ID: <5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059F038D40B2@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "'Jos De_Roo'" <jos.deroo@agfa.com>, andrea.chiodi@mail.inet.it
Cc: www-rdf-rules@w3.org

> [...]
> 
> > Such a description helps me to realize some additional 
> service, like:
> > - add other parameters to the query, not allowed by the 
> SELECT syntax
> > - store the query for subsequent reuse
> > - identify the query (with a URI) as an existing 'desire' 
> of somebody
> > - reason about the query (e.g. splitting it in subqueries)
> >
> > As a ?side? effect, the query itself now is a resource in 
> the semantic
> web,
> [Jos]
> this is a *major* effect

Agreed - sharing queries and being able to say what the query does is
significant.  Also, being able to use GET for query is important because (1)
web caches help and (2) such bookmarks can be exchanged between people and
applications.


> > [Andrea]
> > ? Is it in the topic of this thread? (again apologies if it isn't)

It is for this mailing list.

> 
> > so I could have another query looking for (a query looking for
> something). A
> > good tool for sellers, isn't? :-)
> >
> >
> > The experiment works pretty good,
> 
> great, any URI pointer?
> 
> > and I would like to compare it with other
> > similar experiments.
> 
> others too
> 
> -- ,
> Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
> 

	Andy
Received on Sunday, 19 January 2003 12:40:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:53:10 GMT