W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-rules@w3.org > October 2001

Re: Expressiveness of RDF as Rule Conclusion Language (was Re: W hat is an RDF Query? )

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 23:57:44 -0500
Message-Id: <p05101021b7ed789d5717@[]>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Cc: www-rdf-rules@w3.org
>On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>  And just how are RDF applications supposed to determine when to do this
>>  merging?
>>  peter
>By using all that DAML+OIL good stuff you've been slaving over, of
>course :)
>All DAML+OIL instance data is RDF,

Actually I would say not, though it's only a matter of terminology. 
It is encoded in RDF syntax, but its meaning isn't specified by RDF.

>and RDF apps that are built
>to know about even a subset of DAML+OIL can make good use of that when
>doing data merging.

Well, they can if they are DAML-savvy, but then why don't you call 
them DAML apps rather than RDF apps?

>For eg., consider the property http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/mbox
>from the namespace http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
>	[[
>	FOAF is expressed as an RDF Schema, annotated with DAML to express the
>	fact that a foaf:mbox uniquely picks out an individual.
>	]]
>Excerpting from that schema:
>       <rdf:Property rdf:about="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/mbox"
>	rdfs:label="Personal Mailbox"
>	rdfs:comment="A web-identifiable Internet mailbox associated 
>with  exactly one owner.
>	This property is a 'unique property' in the DAML+OIL sense, in  that
>  	there is at most one individual that has any particular personal
>	mailbox.">
>	<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person" />
>	<rdfs:range 
>rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Resource" />
>  	<rdf:type 
>         <rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" />
>        </rdf:Property>
>Since we say the property is of type 
>we can use this knowledge in RDF-based applications

How does the RDF application know what the DAML expressions mean? 
(Should it know about all the other extensions to RDF that havnt even 
been invented yet?)

>-- for example merging
>blank nodes where each node has a property with the exact same resource as
>its value. In this example, merging nodes that stand for the individual
>whose presonal mailbox is mailto:foo@example.com, perhaps.
>Aside: I could complain here that DAML+OIL gives us no mechanism for 
>that the at-most-one-ness remains static in the face of time and change,
>but that's probably a can of worms best opened in a separate thread.
>DAML+OIL's "worldview" isn't one that explicitly acknowledges time and
>change, and there are good reasons for this being the case. How this
>relates to the need to deploy DAML+OIL ontologies in the Web is something
>that looms rapidly, imho.

Maybe, but you can hardly pin this on DAML; *nobody* has really 
tackled this issue yet, AFAIK.

IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
Received on Saturday, 13 October 2001 00:57:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:49:36 UTC