- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@volcano.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:53:31 -0700
- To: "semantic-web at W3C" <semantic-web@w3c.org>, "OWL at W3C" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
- Cc: "KR-language" <KR-language@YahooGroups.com>
I have put together a description of the world view
(entity-characteristic-proposition hierarchy, including
all predefined entities and properties) for each of the
languages.
http://rhm.cdepot.net/kb/rdf.ho
http://rhm.cdepot.net/kb/owl.ho
http://rhm.cdepot.net/kb/mkr.ho
I am sharing this info. to give you
1. a brief summary of each language
2. a view of the differences between the languages
To facilitate the comparison of languages, I have
added a few concepts to the RDF & OWL world views,
e.g. "entity" and "group".
I have added one concept, "ClassSet", for the purpose
of removing the individual-class conflict in RDF & OWL.
By the current definitions, the meaning of
<Class rdf:ID="x">
is
<x rdf:type="Class">
making "x" both an individual and a class. I propose
a new meaning
<ClassSet rdf:member="x">
which makes "x" a class (which is a member of the set
ClassSet), and not an individual. ClassSet can then
replace Class as the record of all classes.
Dick McCullough
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;
http://rhm.cdepot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2005 01:07:46 UTC