Re: Example of rdf:type and rdfs:subClassOf

> Thanks.  From everyone's comments [1,2,3], I guess that either OWL or RDFS
> entailment is required, right? RDF alone doesn't define inferencing for
> subclasses (or support much of any inferencing really).

Definitively. You are right.

claudio

> --
> Jimmy
>
> [1] Jos:
> i.e. making use of rdfs-rule
>
> [2] Jeremy:
> A point is that this is an rdfs rule - so if you are only using rdf or
> simple entailment, and not rdfs or owl entailment the result does not
> follow.
>
> [3] Claudio Gutierrez:
> The statements make sense only in the framework of RDFS (it uses
> rdfs:subClassOf, etc.), hence i am assuming your question is about
> RDFS-entailment.
>

>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates.
> http://personals.yahoo.com
>

Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 17:07:27 UTC