W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > May 2004

RE: transition www-rdf-logic to public-owl-dev?

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 10:40:42 -0500
Message-Id: <p06001f24bcc15dde5ccd@[10.0.100.76]>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org

>On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 09:29, McBride, Brian wrote:
>> 
>>  > -----Original Message-----
>>  > From: www-rdf-logic-request@w3.org
>>  > [mailto:www-rdf-logic-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dan Connolly
>>  > Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 2:17 PM
>>  > To: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
>>  > Subject: transition www-rdf-logic to public-owl-dev?
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > Jim H. has been workin on an OWL homepage...
>>  >   http://www.w3.org/2004/OWL/
>>  >
>>  > and it got me thinking about creating a public-owl-dev
>>  > mailing list, ala xmlschema-dev
>>  >   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/
>>
>>  Public-sw-dev or is there reason to make it owl specific?

I had the same thought. I'd suggest that if we have an explicit 
reference to a language then lets keep it being RDF rather than OWL. 
But using the 'SW' trope would be better.

On the other hand, is this actually broken right now? Why fix it?

Pat

>
>Umm... for the same reasons we have an OWL recommendation
>and not a semantic web recommendation, I suppose.
>
>>  Brian
>--
>Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
>see you at the WWW2004 in NY 15-21 May?


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Friday, 7 May 2004 11:40:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 11:10:42 UTC