W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > August 2004

Re: RDF-DAML question: missing object

From: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:48:43 +0200
To: "Robert Mark Bram" <relaxedrob@optusnet.com.au>
Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
Message-ID: <PM-EH.20040830094843.36A50.1.1D@192.168.27.2>

On 29.08.2004 12:29:58, Robert Mark Bram wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>I thought that an RDF triple should always include "subject, verb and
>object".
>
>But then I found this example about DAML that seems to miss the object..
>
>==
>http://infomesh.net/2001/swintro/
>
>The second useful DAML construct that we shall go through is the
>daml:UnambiguousProperty class. Saying that a Property is a
>daml:UnambiguousProperty means that if the object of the property is the
>same, then the subjects are equivalent. For example:-
>
>foaf:mbox rdf:type daml:UnambiguousProperty .
>:x foaf:mbox  .
>:y foaf:mbox  .
>==
>
>How are these two allowed to miss the object?

heh, here is what might be the *source* of the problem:

   <pre>foaf:mbox rdf:type daml:UnambiguousProperty .
   :x foaf:mbox <mailto:x@xyz.org> .
   :y foaf:mbox <mailto:x@xyz.org> .</pre>

;)

benjamin
--
Benjamin Nowack

Kruppstr. 100
45145 Essen, Germany
http://www.appmosphere.com/

>Any advice would be most welcome!
>
>Rob
>:)
>
>
>
>-- 
>Robert Mark Bram
>B.Comp.(Systems Development/Business Systems)
>B.Net.Comp.(Hons)
>Doctor of Philosophy Student
>
>School of Network Computing
>Faculty of Information Technology
>Monash University
>Peninsula Campus
>McMahons Rd
>Frankston, VIC 3199
>AUSTRALIA
>
>Phone:  61 3 9904 4394
>Facsimile:  61 3 9904 4124
>Email: robert.mark.bram@infotech.monash.edu.au
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 30 August 2004 07:49:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:49 GMT