W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > April 2004

types of OWL

From: ror <galvinr@tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 13:16:36 +0100
To: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
Message-ID: <406E4601@ntserver-e2w2.tcd.ie>


I've been trying to find the underlying differences between the different 
types of OWL languages i.e: OWL DL, OWL Lite and OWL full.

Are all of these languages forms of Description Logic? As far as I can gather 
OWL Lite is less expressive to suit users who want to incorporate semantics 
into their applications without the over complexity of OWL DL and full.

Does OWL lite use different forms of axioms than full or DL

If someone could set me straight on the differences I would be very grateful!

Received on Friday, 2 April 2004 07:18:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 11:10:42 UTC