W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > May 2003

Re: OWL off-the-shelf?

From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 13:48:07 -0700
Message-ID: <000b01c327b6$13fa5590$bd7ba8c0@rhm8200>
To: <danny666@virgilio.it>, <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>

I should have pointed out that MKE's current limitations
are strictly syntactic.  MKR has a simple triple-style syntax
that is much more uniform than OWL's.  I have not yet
mastered all of OWL's nested structures & syntactic options.

Semantically, OWL Full is a small subset of MKR.

Dick McCullough
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@cdepot.net>
To: <danny666@virgilio.it>; <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 6:13 AM
Subject: Re: OWL off-the-shelf?


>
> MKE/MKR is one such tool.
> As I have noted previously, MKE currently only "knows" simple OWL.
> I will eventually have it reading OWL Full.
>
> Dick McCullough
> knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
> knowledge haspart proposition list;
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@virgilio.it>
> To: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
> Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 5:23 AM
> Subject: OWL off-the-shelf?
>
>
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'm curious - what tools do we have so far that can reason with OWL/RDF
> data
> > off-the-shelf? (By off-the-shelf I mean so you can download, install
with
> > minimal config, give it an OWL RDF file and a query and get a result).
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Danny.
> >
> > ----
> >
> > http://dannyayers.com
> >
> >
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 31 May 2003 16:49:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:46 GMT