I've taken a quick look at the OWL XML presentation syntax at http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/NOTE-owl-xmlsyntax-20030611/ and it actually doesn't look that different from the RDF/XML syntax. It would be useful if the document contained an appendix listing the differences. That might clarify why it was felt necessary to produce an alternative XML serialization. [Jim Hendler] The issue about whether to have an XML presentation has been in our publicly available issues list since Oct 2002... ... if you search on "XML presentation syntax" you will find close to 150 messages dating back to May 2002... The note I'm recommending would save me from reading those 150 messages. -- -- Drew McDermottReceived on Tuesday, 17 June 2003 13:50:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:34:55 GMT