W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > June 2003

RE: OWL off-the-shelf?

From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2003 00:43:38 +0200
To: "Dave Reynolds" <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BKELLDAGKABIOCHDFDBPOENPCPAA.danny666@virgilio.it>

Excellent news.

Have you been approaching the rules from the LP angle? I'm curious because
I've been trying to see how far I can get with RDF/OWL in Prolog
(implemented in Java) - I was hit by loops almost immediately ;-)

Cheers,
Danny.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Reynolds [mailto:der@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
> Sent: 02 June 2003 12:36
> To: danny666@virgilio.it
> Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
> Subject: Re: OWL off-the-shelf?
>
>
> Hi Danny,
>
> We are pretty close to that with Jena2. We have a couple of prototype rule
> engines working, together with rule sets that implement a reasonable
> approximation to OWL-(f)lite. The hope is to get these shaken
> down enough to
> include in the next Jena2 preview in a few weeks.
>
> Dave
>
> Danny Ayers wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'm curious - what tools do we have so far that can reason with
> OWL/RDF data
> > off-the-shelf? (By off-the-shelf I mean so you can download,
> install with
> > minimal config, give it an OWL RDF file and a query and get a result).
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Danny.
> >
> > ----
> >
> > http://dannyayers.com
Received on Saturday, 7 June 2003 18:50:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:46 GMT