- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 09:13:03 +0200
- To: "Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott" <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
- Cc: "www-rdf-logic" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
> It sure seems that way to this spectator of the conversation. > To end this dispute about terminology, let's just cede "RDF agent" to > the logicists, and use another term, say, "RDF-based agent," for an > inference engine that uses RDF as its input and output notation. right, "-based" is making the difference > The objection that there are no a-priori limits on what an RDF-based > agent can infer seems silly to me. Each RDF-based agent is to be > proposed in its own context and evaluated on whatever merits are > claimed for it. what kind of context is meant here? is it something like RDF/RDFS/OWL/etc entailment rules? -- Jos De Roo
Received on Friday, 31 May 2002 03:27:16 UTC