Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding

> It sure seems that way to this spectator of the conversation.
> To end this dispute about terminology, let's just cede "RDF agent" to
> the logicists, and use another term, say, "RDF-based agent," for an
> inference engine that uses RDF as its input and output notation.

right, "-based" is making the difference

> The objection that there are no a-priori limits on what an RDF-based
> agent can infer seems silly to me.  Each RDF-based agent is to be
> proposed in its own context and evaluated on whatever merits are
> claimed for it.

what kind of context is meant here?
is it something like RDF/RDFS/OWL/etc entailment rules?

--
Jos De Roo