W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > March 2002

Re: rdfs:Class vs. daml:Class ?

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 19:10:52 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020320191023.06a3e9e8@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org

At 13:04 20/03/2002 +0000, Ian Horrocks wrote:
[...]

> > This is the first I have heard of this proposal to redefine the model for
> > RDF and RDFS, so its not surprising there has been no 'official response',
> > at least from RDFCore.
>
>Fair enough - it was never really a proposal, just a paper published as SWWS.

I'll look forward to reading it :)

Brian

Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2002 14:14:08 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Siegfried Handschuh: "3'nd CFP: ECAI 2002 Semantic Authoring, Annotation & Knowledge Markup Workshop"
Previous message: Graham Klyne: "Re: Web Ontology Requirements Document - comments sought"
In reply to: Ian Horrocks: "Re: rdfs:Class vs. daml:Class ?"
Next in thread: Dan Connolly: "Re: rdfs:Class vs. daml:Class ?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:34:50 GMT