- From: Alberto Reggiori <areggiori@webweaving.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 15:08:25 +0200
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- CC: RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, RDF Logic <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Patrick Stickler wrote: > On 2002-06-24 18:00, "ext Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org> wrote: > > Note that the approach I am proposing also would support arbitrary > "colored" triples, not just a binary unasserted/asserted distinction: > > <rdf:Statement rdf:about="#foo"/> > <xxx:bar rdf:resource="#bas"/> > </rdf:Statement> > > <rdf:Description rdf:about="&xxx;bar"> > <rdf:type rdf:resource="#redPredicate"/> > </rdf:Description> > > <rdf:Statement rdf:about="#foo"/> > <yyy:bar rdf:resource="#bas"/> > </rdf:Statement> > > <rdf:Description rdf:about="&yyy;bar"> > <rdf:type rdf:resource="#bluePredicate"/> > </rdf:Description> > > <rdf:Statement rdf:about="#foo"/> > <zzz:bar rdf:resource="#bas"/> > </rdf:Statement> > > <rdf:Description rdf:about="&zzz;bar"> > <rdf:type rdf:resource="#greenPredicate"/> > </rdf:Description> > > etc. where a given application (e.g. via a "color" > specific API) would interact with the knowledge > base, seeing as asserted both the fundamental > RDF asserted triples as well as the colored > triples of interest. could you try to make an example which uses the above syntax to encode a rule/formula? i.e. X=>Y can your syntax "scope" asserted and un-asserted as well then? i.e. doing things similar to the rdf:bagID effect :-) thank you Alberto
Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2002 09:01:54 UTC