W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > April 2002

Re: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05

From: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 07:36:56 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200204211136.g3LBauU24569@pantheon-po01.its.yale.edu>
To: drager@bbn.com, www-rdf-logic@w3.org
CC: drew.mcdermott@yale.edu

Hello, Dave --

In your capacity as keeper of the DARPA/SONAT ontologies, I have a
question about the "instance data."  I am cc-ing www-rdf-logic because
there seems to be a general issue here about how DAML datasets work.

These ontologies are found at 


and I don't think they're sensitive (or they would be https: instead
of http:).

The file af-a.daml is RDF, rather than DAML, and appears to consist of
"instance data," not ontology.

Here is the beginning of that file:


  <rdf:Description rdf:about='http://www.daml.org/2001/12/factbook/af.daml#A1202'>
    <NS0:country rdf:resource='http://www.daml.org/2001/09/countries/fips#AF'/>
    <rdf:type rdf:resource='http://www.daml.org/2001/12/factbook/factbook-ont#Port'/>

My problem is this:

Wouldn't it be much more informative if this line


were supplemented by something like this:

  <daml:imports rdf:resource="http://www.daml.org/experiment/ontology/beta/elements-ont#"/>

But it's not clear where this would go.

Is it supposed to be the case that just mentioning an ontology's
namespace means that the file uses that ontology?  I find that rather
disconcerting.  For the time being, we'll make that assumption, but
this seems like a bug (or gap) in the DAML spec.  There ought to be an
official way to say "This RDF file is based on ontologies X, Y, and

                                             -- Drew McDermott
Received on Sunday, 21 April 2002 07:37:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 11:10:37 UTC