- From: Aaron Michal <amichal@intellidimension.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:49:09 -0400
- To: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Perhaps I should rephrase the question... Can an anonymous node be used where a literal is required? In other words, is it possible the have an anonymous literal. -AM ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aaron Michal" <amichal@intellidimension.com> To: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 4:36 PM Subject: <p> <rdfs:range> <rdfs:Literal> > Perhaps this is something that has already been discussed but I want to > check an assumption. Under RDF Model Theory [1], are the following triples > legal RDFS? > > <_s> <p> <_o> > <p> <rdfs:range> <rdfs:Literal> > > What about under http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327/ or the > previous version? > > -AM > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-rdf-mt-20010925/ > > >
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2001 12:44:27 UTC