- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 21:12:08 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- CC: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>, Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>, www-rdf-logic@w3.org
Graham Klyne wrote: [...] > Is it not a different approach to have the subject resource of a statement > reification stand for the *interpretation* of the statement in the domain > of discourse, rather that a quotation of the original statement? Yes, it's a different approach; an approach I can't make any sense of. I've been reading up on possible world semantics and such; using that might work out. But I haven't managed to figure it out. > (I rather > thought that this was what Pat Hayes was trying to suggest in a previous > message [1].) -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Sunday, 27 May 2001 22:12:15 UTC