- From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 23:20:19 -0400
- To: "David Allsopp" <dallsopp@signal.dera.gov.uk>
- Cc: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>, <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
David Allsopp wrote: > > Jonathan Borden wrote: > > > > I have written a brief strawman proposal defining an RDF > Abstract Syntax. > > > > http://www.openhealth.org/RDF/RDFAbstractSyntax.html > > You write: > "The index gives the index of a statement within a context in document > order. The index allows preservation of statement order as if each RDF > <Description> defines a container, and folds the RDF concept of > container directly into the RDF Abstract Syntax." > > Is it implicit that a single context only contains data from one > document? a context is a URI reference. it would probably come from one document but not necessarily. If not, how can 'document order' be preserved? What if a > second document adds triples to a container? i suppose the index would be incremented as statements are added to the model much as how a container is handled in RDF M&S 1.0. -Jonathan
Received on Friday, 25 May 2001 23:21:28 UTC