W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > March 2001

Re: gedcom-relation example

From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:26:39 -0500
Message-ID: <00c201c0b277$89afdc30$b601a8c0@CREST>
To: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>, <mdean@bbn.com>
Cc: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>, <boley@informatik.uni-kl.de>

Thanks for converting this into N3.

I had to make two changes to use it.   In the rules, for cwm you have to
state that the rule is
true - the "forAll" doens't do that for you. The other thing is that you
omit the colon when you use a locanname with a void namespace prefix.
My versions are listed in http://www.3.org/2000/10/swap/Examples.html

(where is the original of this from?)


----- Original Message -----
From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
To: <mdean@bbn.com>
Cc: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>; <boley@informatik.uni-kl.de>
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 6:06 PM
Subject: gedcom-relation example

> Mike,
> We have been playing a bit with your GEDCOM example.
> We actually rewrote it in N3 and the relations are at
> http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/gedcom-relations.n3
> To have a practical example, some facts are at
> http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/gedcom-facts.n3
> We did all kinds of queries such as at
> http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/gedcom-query.n3
> and found all kinds of proofs such as at
> http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/gedcom-relations.n3
> We had to fix (actually simplify) cycle detection.
> Recursions and mutual references seem to work ...
> Maybe the proofs can give an idea about possible
> simplifications of the relations ...
> --
> Jos De Roo, Agfa http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2001 21:27:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 11:10:34 UTC