At 04:45 PM 3/17/01 +0100, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com wrote: > {{:gregorian :grandparent :bret} log:implies > {{:gregorian :skolemfun :bret} :parent :bret}} log:implies > {{:gregorian :skolemfun :bret} a :isLoved}. This is intriguing stuff... (...meaning I'm not sure that I understand the details ;^) >I try to find evidence that having (nested) dyadic formulae >is a good thing to limit to ... Are you referring here to the idea that the form "{:gregorian :skolemfun :bret}" for Skolem functions limits us to Dyadic Skolem functions? #g ------------ Graham Klyne GK@NineByNine.orgReceived on Sunday, 18 March 2001 20:35:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:34:45 GMT