Re: RDF Statements as floating Cons Cells

...
Pat wrote:
> Maybe we should stick to using RDF as a simple ground-data language,
> and just build or use something else altogether for doing more
> complicated stuff.

Well maybe or maybe not (what was that again?)
I'm still thinking about 'transistors' (*) and
trying to build 'logic circuits' without them
(but maybe my teachers brainwashed me too much)

--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

(*) 'some'-things like e.g.
             -----
    is----->|  s  |
     |       -----
   -----   p   -----
  |     |---->|  o  |
   -----       -----