W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > July 2001

Re: Why must the web be monotonic ?

From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:22:05 -0700
Message-ID: <002201c1147e$4f984aa0$b17ba8c0@c1457248a.sttls1.wa.home.com>
To: "pat hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>, "www-rdf-logic" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
From: "pat hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>

> Right now, DAML+OIL and RDF have not entered into this area, but
> 'rules' languages need to consider it seriously, in my view. The
> global advantages of monotonicity should not be casually tossed
> aside, but at the same time the computational advantages of
> nonmonotonic reasoning modes is hard to deny, and they are widely
> used in the current state of the art. We need ways for them to
> co-exist smoothly.

How about just stating that a given context is monotonic like the following?

[1] {TheGroup containsMembers Pat, Tim, exp(membersOf  RDFLogic). }
instanceOf MonotonicContext.

This syntax of [1] is an extension of N3 called Semenglish, please find the
Bacus Naur definiton at [2]

[2] http://robustai.net/mentography/SyntaxSemenglish7.gif

Thanks, as always,  for you clearity.

Seth Russell
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2001 16:27:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C0.50 : Wednesday, 11 January 2006 15:19:08 GMT