W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > February 2001

Re: Where DAML+OIL deviates from the RDF-Schema spec.

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 09:56:20 +0000
Message-Id: <>
To: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
At 11:53 PM 2/24/01 +0100, Frank van Harmelen wrote:
>"[in DAML+OIL] multiple domain expressions restrict the domain of P to the 
>intersection of
>the class expressions.
>Warning: This is contrary to the semantics of the domain element in the 
>RDF Schema
>specification, which we believe to be flawed."
>"Warning: Although the RDF Schema specification only allows one range 
>restriction for each
>property, it seems quite natural to allow multiple range restrictions. 
>These would then
>again be interpreted as saying that the range of P must be the 
>intersection of all the
>class expressions."

FWIW, I would support changes to RDFS to be more like DAML+OIL in these 
respects.  I think these interpretations are more consistent with the 
overall structure of RDF.

(My rationale:  under "open-world" assumptions RDFS (alone) can not 
generally be used to detect errors in RDF, but it can be used to make 
inferences.  The usages described above better support inference.)


Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
Received on Sunday, 25 February 2001 06:48:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 11:10:34 UTC