Re: universal languages

It does sound interesting.  It is not that I want to be able to
encode the meaning of natural speech (because I don't regard
such utterances as logic, being connected with the analogue triggerings
of various associations in the sender's and receiver's brains).
I am interested if it is a powerful high-order language of which all
practical languages for automation on the web can be shown to
be (equivalent to) subsets.

Tim


> Peter Patel-Schneider
>