W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > February 2001

Re: universal languages

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:24:49 -0500 (EST)
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
cc: <timbl@w3.org>, <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>, <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0102011418000.7674-100000@tux.w3.org>
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

> From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: universal languages
> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:58:43 -0500 (EST)
>
> >
> > One might also point out that XML can "represent anything"... as can
> > Unicode...
> >
> > dan
>
>
> I most strongly disagree with the first part of this statement!  (I also
> disagree with the second part, but less strongly.)

I assert that you should agree or disagree with both equally, for the
mischievous sense of "represent" that I had in mind.

<Blob>
  Dan Brickley believes that XML can represent anything, but Peter
  Patel-Schneider doesn't (yet) agree with him.
</Blob>

Dan
Received on Thursday, 1 February 2001 14:24:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:38 GMT