W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > December 2001

Re: DAML+RDFS: potentials for simplifications?

From: Thomas B. Passin <tpassin@home.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 19:12:29 -0500
Message-ID: <001701c182a1$b04a9d30$7cac1218@cj64132b>
To: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
[Peter F. Patel-Schneider]

> From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: DAML+RDFS: potentials for simplifications?
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 12:37:17 -0600
>
> >
> > The spec says in so many words:
> >
> >   "A DAML+OIL knowledge base is a collection of RDF triples."
> > -- http://www.daml.org/2001/03/reference.html
>
> So?  An RDF/XML document is an XML document, but I don't think that an XML
> processor will at like an RDF processor just because it is given an
RDF/XML
> document instead of some other XML document.
>

Right.  You may be able to parse a sentence and know that it is a sentence,
even know the subject, etc., but still not know what the sentence means to
convey.

Cheers,

Tom P
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2001 19:12:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:41 GMT