Er... in the interest of keeping www-rdf-logic a reasonably cost-effective forum to exchange ideas about specific technologies and systems, could I aks that folks that want to continue this discussion take it elsewhere? (You're welcome to use www-archive@w3.org as a public archive.) A rule of thumb: if a thread goes back and forth three times without -- proposing a specific wording change in the DAML spec or some document related to RDF and logic -- excerpting from some spec and asking for clarification -- exhibiting a specific test case or bug report -- announcing new tools, applications, or schemas/ontologies for folks to try out or somehow connecting to tangible nuts and bolts of something this forum can help with, I'd prefer that thread be taken off this list. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Friday, 13 April 2001 22:50:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:34:45 GMT