<- What is probably needed is a pointer to a good advanced book on logic. I've got a couple on my shelf that have remained contentedly unread for many a year ;-) <- Your scheme above is encoding, not expressing, because RDF has <- no mechanism <- that can be used to capture the meaning of negation. Can you give me an example of a model that *can* be used to capture the meaning? Why does it need to capture the meaning in any case - if machine A understands a = !b means 'not' and machine B understands a = !b means 'not' why does the data model have to understand for a message to be conveyed? I'm going to do some reading, because I still can't see the problem.Received on Monday, 9 April 2001 10:20:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:38 GMT