W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > November 2000

Closedness strikes back! [Was: Equality and subclass axioms]

From: Je'ro^me Euzenat <Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 00:09:51 +0100
Message-Id: <a05010400b6489502f06d@[194.199.22.158]>
To: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>, Jim Hendler <jhendler@darpa.mil>
Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
Hello list,

	remember that old thread were I was desesperately trying to 
explain my viewpoint? [Sorry I am not fluent in quoting list-archives]
	I thought that my english was so bad that no one was able to 
understand what I meant. I meant just the conclusion of the "Equality 
and subclass axioms" thread, namely that the problem does not comes 
from equality by from openness.
	It is nice to be able to add new constraints to terms:
triangle = (atleast 3 angles)
triangle = (atleast 3 sides)
and it has nothing to do with equality (funny, in the previous thread 
I had to argue that it has nothing to do with primitive classes - 
which is exactly the opposite situation).

	So what does James Hendler really wants?
	He wants the ability to prohibit further constraints on a 
term by the ontologies which import it.
	This is what I called closing a term definition.

	I still believe that this might be very useful to ontology 
designers (prescribers) and users/refiners (adopters).
	This is only a syntactic way to solve the problem raised by 
Jim. It has absolutely no impact on the semantics (which remains the 
same).

-- 
  Jérôme Euzenat                  __
                                  /      /\
  INRIA Rhône-Alpes,            _/  _   _   _ _    _
                               /_) | ` / ) | \ \  /_)
  655, avenue de l'Europe,    (___/___(_/_/  / /_(_________________
  Montbonnot St Martin,       /        http://www.inrialpes.fr/exmo
  38334 Saint-Ismier cedex,  /          Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr
  France____________________/                Jerome.Euzenat@free.fr
Received on Monday, 27 November 2000 18:39:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 11:10:33 UTC