- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 00:55:28 -0600
- To: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
- CC: RDF Logic <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Sergey Melnik wrote: > > This question might have been raised. > > Why are DAML-O restrictions are not related to the RDFS constraint > mechanism? Because I don't understand the RDFS contraint mechanism, I guess. > I'd expect: > > damlO:Restriction --rdfs:subClassOf--> rdfs:ConstraintResource > > and > > damlO:restrictedBy --rdfs:subPropertyOf--> rdfs:ConstraintProperty What would you do with that information, if you had it? (btw... feel free to assert that in your own knowledge bases, if it helps; just because an assertion isn't in the daml-ont.daml file doesn't mean it's not sensible or true.) -- bind default <http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/kb> <mailto:connolly@w3.org> is mailbox of [a Person; called "Dan Connolly"; affiliation [ a Consortium; called "W3C"; homePage <http://www.w3.org> ]; homePage <http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/> ].
Received on Friday, 3 November 2000 01:55:32 UTC