W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2007

Re: What if an URI also is a URL

From: Reto Bachmann-Gmür <rbg@talis.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:30:43 +0200
Message-ID: <46D728F3.6000800@talis.com>
To: Oskar Welzl <lists@welzl.info>
CC: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, wangxiao@musc.edu

Oskar Welzl wrote:
> [....]
> I'm not willing to accept this, so I'll have to stick with my original
> intention of creating a URI other than http://www.flickr.com for flickr,
> the service. Or, more practical at the moment, use
> http://oskar.twoday.net/ID/names#thisblog or some similar construct for
> my weblog, maybe even provide some machine-readable info about the
> website there. (BTW: is there a somewhat popular ontology to describe
> websites? like: domain, index page, contact, sitemap,...)
>
> Pity, though, that there hardly seems to be an agreement on how to
> handle this issue, so simply by choosing the above URI myself I will not
> prevent *others* making statements like 
> <#thismail> mail:sender <http://oskar.twoday.net>
> when they refer to an update-notification they received from the weblog.
>   
Reading this I think I misunderstood what you mean with "blog" I was
referring to a blog as a changing collection of articles not as
something that sends email. If we agree that an information resource
can't be the mail:sender of a mail then the statement

<#thismail> mail:sender <http://oskar.twoday.net>

is necessarily wrong, as a GET request to http://oskar.twoday.net is
responded with a 2XX response and with this response the resource in
unambiguously an information[1]. resource.

reto

1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Jun/0039.html

-- 
Reto Bachmann-Gmür
Talis Information Limited

Book your free place now at Talis Insight 2007 www.talis.com/insight
Find out more about Talis at www.talis.com
Shared InovationTM
 
Any views or personal opinions expressed within this email may not be those of Talis Information Ltd.
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2007 20:31:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:19 GMT