W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > July 2006

Re: Multiple (conflicting) rdfs:range properties

From: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:21:50 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200607201721.NAA17624@clue.mel.nist.gov>
To: alexander.pohoyda@gmx.net, fmanola@acm.org
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org

Frank Manola wrote:

>For there to be a problem with a resource being both an instance of both 
>the rdfs:Literal and my:Class1 classes, there would have to be an *RDFS* 
>condition saying that rdfs:Literal was disjoint from other RDFS classes. 
>  But there is no such condition in RDFS.

Of course, OWL DL does have category disjointness conditions.  Hence
the example given is not valid OWL DL.


Evan K. Wallace
Manufacturing Systems Integration Division
Received on Thursday, 20 July 2006 17:22:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:58 UTC