>From a modelling point of view, the container/collection side of both RSS 1.0 and 1.1 do seem a little troublesome. I'll pass on figuring out the details here ;-) But both express membership and order in a way that to me doesn't seem to fit very well with the domain model, which seems generally to be what's at the feed URI at a given point in time is a sliding window onto the conceptual feed comprised of all items (ever). An early question - the 1.1 spec says "order of the [items] child elements is significant" - but what is the significance (bearing in mind that most RSS 1.0 feeds incorporate a dc:date)? Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.comReceived on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:05:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Wednesday, 3 August 2005 18:08:36 GMT