On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:57:02 +0000, Sean B. Palmer <sean+rss@infomesh.net> wrote: > Moreover, since the uptake of RSS 1.0 presumably wasn't hampered on the > (purely aesthetic) shunning of class capitalization, we don't believe > that it'll be an important factor in RSS 1.1 either. There's a small benefit for class capitalization (easier to read), and a small benefit for all lower-case (less likely to confuse plain-XML people, if they got this far...). Either way there's also a small aesthetic benefit. What would be the cost of consistency? Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.comReceived on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 15:22:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Wednesday, 3 August 2005 18:08:36 GMT