- From: Stefano Mazzocchi <stefano@apache.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:25:56 -0500
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: Phil Dawes <pdawes@users.sourceforge.net>, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org, atom-owl@googlegroups.com
Sandro Hawke wrote: >> <a> >> <-b-> >> <c/> >> </-b-> >> </a> > > I kinds of like the idea of just using the case of the first letter, > where upper case means class names. That's right. The problem is that you have to work with RDF for a while to realize that it's a design pattern built into the good behaving ontologies. If we come up with a proposal for an EXML dialect (E for explicit), I think it might be a great bridge for moving people over to the RDF world (or transform their XML into RDF automatically) > Or turn the element into a URI and > look it up to see whether it's a Class or Property. that's exactly the kind of things that people from the XML world want to avoid (as much as they can). -- Stefano.
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:25:59 UTC