W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2005

Re: XML or RDF lexicons

From: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:01:26 +0000
Message-Id: <A5841202-6331-11D9-B30E-000A95D338FC@reading.ac.uk>
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
To: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>

Lisa,
   These may be of interest to you.

http://www.semanticweb.org/library/
http://xmlns.com/2001/08/wordnet/

-R

On Jan 10, 2005, at 17:50, Lisa Seeman wrote:

> Hi Danny
> I can not see how you can point to wordnet as individual entries and 
> concepts.
>  
> http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/~wn/ , gives me access to a web 
> service, but how do I reference individual entries.
>  
> (I may be missing the obvious...)
> Thanks
> L
>  
> ----- Original Message -----
>  From: Danny Ayers
> To: Lisa Seeman
> Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 4:49 PM
> Subject: Re: XML or RDF lexicons
>
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:08:37 +0200, Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com> 
> wrote:
> > 
>  > 
> > I am working on a language disambiguation tool in RDF. Is anyone 
> aware of
> > different online XML or RDF lexicons (preferably that support 
> Xpointer to
> > specific definitions)
>
>  There's WordNet [1], which has been expressed in RDF already but is
> also the subject of an active Working Group, see [2,3].
>
> Oops, I'm listed as being a member of the WG, though haven't yet
> contributed, and haven't been following as well as I should - anyone
> got an update on the current status?
>
> Cheers,
> Danny.
>
> [1] http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/~wn/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/tf.html
> [3] 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wordnet-sw-20040713.html
> -- 
>
>  http://dannyayers.com
Received on Monday, 10 January 2005 18:02:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:12 GMT