> I can't think of any > harmful side effects of treating that document identifier as being the > same as the graph identifier, as the operational semantics of the > document handling (GETting the thing over HTTP) will generally be > orthogonal to the declarative semantics any graph-juggling system will > be using. One could just introduce a statement that clarifies this, of course. < myGraph eg:representsGraphAt "http://example.com/some.rdf" > Cheers, ChrisReceived on Wednesday, 5 January 2005 18:47:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:12 GMT