W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > February 2005

RE: missing bit of RDF for XML people

From: Geoff Chappell <gchappell@intellidimension.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:40:51 -0500
To: "'Karl Dubost'" <karl@w3.org>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00d501c50abf$24b06b20$6401a8c0@gsclaptop>

I remember looking at this at one point[1] and coming down on the side of
implicit relationships rather than implicit resources (though that may have
been an arbitrary personal preference between two imperfect alternatives). I
also remember thinking that an ideal solution would likely include some sort
of schema annotation that would let the author hint at how to perform the
transformation (I liked this idea better than just a xsl to convert from
rdf->xml because it potentially allows for bidirectional conversion).

-Geoff


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/2002Jul/0089.html


> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org [mailto:www-rdf-interest-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Karl Dubost
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 8:16 AM
> To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Subject: Re: missing bit of RDF for XML people
> 
> 
> 
> Le 04 févr. 2005, à 07:57, Henry Story a écrit :
> > country  - (blank_predicate1) --> "Canada"
> > country  - (blank_predicate1) --> "Paris"
> 
> You meant
> country  - (blank_predicate1) --> "Canada"
> country  - (blank_predicate1) --> "France"
> 
> which is not inconsistent :)
> > [1] also available at
> >     https://bloged.dev.java.net/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=441
> 
> Yes I have seen it and it's why I thought about the silly thing above ;)
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
> W3C Conformance Manager
> *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 4 February 2005 13:40:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:13 GMT