W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > September 2004

Re: OWL and real world

From: Adrian Walker <adrianw@snet.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:24:17 -0400
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20040924121734.01d15b30@pop.snet.net>
To: Tanel Tammet <tammet@staff.ttu.ee>
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org

Hi Tanel --

[Adrian wrote]

Actually, there's are a rather straightforward, pragmatic solution to these
kinds of questions.

The basic idea is, don't try to hard code everything you need about the real
world in a fixed system of logic. (Most OWL folks seem to assume you have 
to do
this.)

Instead, tie some lightweight natural language processing to logical rules, so
that people can see what the predicates are supposed to mean in the real world.
...

[Tanel, replying to Adrian, wrote]

>However,  these kinds of solutions are never universal nor
>domain-independent. The solutions become also more and more
>complex as they target wider and wider applicability. The
>same, seemingly straightforward negation-as-failure brings a huge
>amount of complexity into play.

[Adrian replies]

Can you show an example?  Or better yet, write it and run it in the online 
system [1] ?

                         Cheers,  -- Adrian


                                        [1] INTERNET BUSINESS LOGIC (R)

                                              www.reengineeringllc.com

Dr. Adrian Walker
Reengineering LLC
PO Box 1412
Bristol
CT 06011-1412 USA

Phone: USA 860 583 9677
Cell:    USA  860 830 2085
Fax:    USA  860 314 1029
Received on Friday, 24 September 2004 16:18:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:09 GMT