W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > September 2004

RE: Generated RDF conformant with good practise?

From: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:17:12 -0700
To: "Libby Miller" <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

> ah, I misunderstood what a bib was, sorry, serves me right for rushing
> it. It might clarify things to have typed Bib and Book objects perhaps.

OK, I didn't make that clear. Sorry. Given that understanding then, I'd like
to re-ask my question to see if your answer still holds. Assuming we want
our RDF to represent a bibliography containing pointers to various books, do
you still feel the following is a reasonable way of modelling that
relationship (ignoring the question of typed vs untyped nodes)?

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:bibterm="http://www.book-stuff.com/terms/"
         <bibterm:book rdf:parseType="Resource">
                 <dc:title>TCP/IP Illustrated</dc:title>
         <bibterm:book rdf:parseType="Resource">
                 <dc:title>Advanced Programming in the Unix

Received on Friday, 17 September 2004 00:15:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:53 UTC