W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > October 2004

Re: RDF tools and Accepts headers. A survey.

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:41:26 +0100
To: "Jon Hanna" <jon@hackcraft.net>
Cc: "'RDF interest group'" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20041014104126.6bacbcae@hoth.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:47:15 +0100, "Jon Hanna" <jon@hackcraft.net> wrote:

> 
> I'm curious to know how many RDF tools, whether full applications,
> toolkits, libraries or whatever, that query URIs include the
> Accept: application/rdf+xml header, and how many do not. (With GET,
> URIQA's use of MGET would be an exception to what I'm concerned
> with here).
> 
> Since just about every tool probably had a user on this list, if
> not a creator, could people let me know about the tools they are
> familiar with. If people send the results off-list I'll summarise
> for the list later.

Redland (via Raptor, which provides the Web part of Redland) does
send Accept: application/rdf+xml when asking for RDF/XML but it also
accepts other mime types, since many people think that text/plain,
text/xml and other types are correct for shipping XML, RDF/XML or
whatever.

Dave
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2004 09:59:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:10 GMT