On 11/10/2004 20:26, Joshua Allen wrote: > Are there actually any RSS 1.0 extensions in popular use? I note that > RSS 2.0 approach made it very easy for podcasting to catch hold, and > this may be a consideration when evaluating an extensibility philosophy. I'm sure you're aware that RSS 1.0 extensions are just RDF vocabularies. http://www.schemaweb.info/ has a good list of RDF schemas, all of which can be used with RSS 1.0. I don't have any hard evidence to hand, but I suspect that Dublin Core[1], syndication[2], content[3], admin[4], FOAF[5], and possibly bio[6] are very popular and useful extensions. I certainly see them all the time when I'm processing RSS. Ian [1] http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ [2] http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/ [3] http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/ [4] http://webns.net/mvcb/ [5] http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/ [6] http://purl.org/vocab/bio/0.1/Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2004 11:44:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:10 GMT