RE: Some thoughts on effective access to "primary" vs "secondary" resources, consistency of descriptions, and bootstrapping the semantic w eb...

This has come up again recently on public-esw-thes@w3.org also.

Re keeping concepts and documents disjoint, see [1][2].

Re working around limitations of sURI see [3].

Al.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2004Sep/0012.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2004Sep/0032.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2004Sep/0016.html

---
Alistair Miles
Research Associate
CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Building R1 Room 1.60
Fermi Avenue
Chilton
Didcot
Oxfordshire OX11 0QX
United Kingdom
Email:        a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440



> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
> Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
> Sent: 08 October 2004 11:46
> To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Some thoughts on effective access to "primary" vs "secondary"
> resources, consistency of descriptions, and bootstrapping the semantic
> web...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I draw the SWBP WG's attention to some comments which I feel
> are relevant to the WG's activities:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2004Oct/0086.html
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Patrick
> 
> 

Received on Friday, 8 October 2004 15:01:53 UTC