W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > May 2004

Re: Incompatibilities in RDQL implementations

From: Arjohn Kampman <arjohn.kampman@aduna.biz>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 15:28:16 +0200
Message-ID: <409A3D70.2000904@aduna.biz>
To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org

Seaborne, Andy wrote:
[...]
> My current test suite covers old and new syntactic forms for backwards
> compatibility:
> http://jena.hpl.hp.com/2003/07/query/rdql-tests-jena-2.1a.zip
> 
> Check http://jena.hpl.hp.com/2003/07/query/ as later versions appear.

Hi Andy, others,

Is the RDQL grammar at [1] up-to-date? If not, could you consider
updating it? Also, could you consider defining the terminals like
<SUCHTHAT>, <STR_MATCH> and <STRING_LITERAL1> in the grammar for the
sake of making it complete and to prevent deviations in implementations?
Currently, one has be dive into the code to find out the definition of
the terminals.

Thanks,

Arjohn

[1] http://jena.sourceforge.net/RDQL/rdql_grammar.html

-- 
arjohn.kampman@aduna.biz
Aduna BV - http://aduna.biz/
Prinses Julianaplein 14-b, 3817 CS Amersfoort, The Netherlands
tel. +31-(0)33-4659987  fax. +31-(0)33-4659987
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2004 09:29:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:07 GMT