W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > May 2004

RE: less-restrictive range and domain terms

From: Rhoads, Stephen <SRhoads@ThruPoint.net>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 13:36:56 -0400
Message-ID: <B24F5C4EDA48D511B6CB00508BDFC194BB85D9@nyexchclstr.thrupoint.net>
To: "'www-rdf-interest@w3.org'" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
<slightlyOffTopic>

>> I understand what you mean: intuitively, "the" right
>> range of pet:owner might be foaf:Person.

Until someone comes along and wants to say:

Benji rdf:type ex:Dog
Benji pet:owner ex:AtlantaPoliceDepartment

or,

Charlie rdf:type ex:Parrot
Charlie pet:owner ex:KeyLargoBoatHouse

What to do?  Range is something broad like "Entity"?  And when someone finds
a valid use for pet:owner with a "non-Entity"?

I'm becoming doubtful about the usefulness of global domain and range
constraints within the context of the Web -- which is fine save for its
current prominence in the RDF documentation.

</slightlyOffTopic>

Note:  The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message
is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from
your computer. Thank you.  ThruPoint, Inc. 
Received on Tuesday, 4 May 2004 13:41:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:07 GMT