On Mar 23, 2004, at 2:14 PM, Graham Klyne wrote: > > It turns out that getting Apache to serve application/rdf+xml is dead > easy. Simply adding the following line to one's .htaccess file does > the trick for *.rdf files. > > AddType application/rdf+xml .rdf You probably want to add it to your conf/mime.types as application/rdf+xml rdf RDF Rdf or add the above line to httpd.conf as ".htaccess" files have rather large performance/security downsides. While on the subject - was draft-swartz-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-01 ever turned into an RFC ? If that is the case them I am perfectly happy to add the above to the Apache standard distributions. Right now the last I can find is a 'Should Not' in RFC3023: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3023.txt 8.18 Application/rdf+xml Content-type: application/rdf+xml <?xml version="1.0" ?> RDF documents identified using this MIME type are XML documents whose content describes metadata, as defined by [RDF]. As a format based on XML, RDF documents SHOULD use the '+xml' suffix convention in their MIME content-type identifier. However, no content type has yet been registered for RDF and so this media type should not be used until such registration has been completed. Which makes it a bit hard for me to argue that we should put this mime type in the core apache distributions. Dw.Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2004 08:35:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:05 GMT